Sunday, January 15, 2006

Nick Cohen - Fascist

See what I did there. I took the name of someone I disagree with politically, and put the word fascist next to his name. I didn't offer any definition of what I mean by fascist, or an intelligent analysis of the contemporary phenomena of fascism, I just used the word. It's a very useful technique, try it yourselves sometime.

Cohen's article in today's Observer reaches impressive heights of hysteria even for him. Apparently Respect is disintegrating because of Galloway's appearance on Big Brother. The left (he uses that wonderfully vague word 'liberal') are sick of him, and he 'can no longer count on their indulgence'. I clearly missed this. Obviously Nick is in a much better position than me to know these things, after all, I'm just a member of the organisations he mentions in the article. What would I know about it.

Actually, I know this: The SWP is not going to split from Galloway. Respect is a coalition, and believe it or not, coalition partners can disagree. Socialist Worker makes pretty clear the mood of most SWP members on the nonsense happening in Big Brother.

Despite Cohen's more delusional rantings, Respect did unite on points of principle. In fact, what he seems to fail miserably to understand is that precisely the reason that he is on one side of the fence, and every other significant section of left-wing opinion is on the other, is that we united in opposition to the plundering and occupation of Iraq, and he lined up with the apologists and the warmongers. He's missed that point of principle, because it's not his. This is fine. He's entitled to his opinion. What he cannot do is paint the SWP as opportunists going against their values. The defining faultline of 21st century politics so far is the question of where you stand on American Imperialism: do you resist, or do you apologise? Cohen apologised; we resisted. In fact, to Cohen's dismay, 'the most disgraceful protest movement since the Thirties', was also the biggest ever. 2 million marched, thousands walked out, and opinion polls were squarely against the government. Apparently we were all apologists for Saddam, islamofascists, to use Cohen's impressive rhetoric.

Still, this is par for the course for the 'pro-war left' (though I keep missing what's left about them). What's really interesting is how Cohen increasingly sounds like a journalist writing for the sectarian left. All these ridiculous pronouncements about Respect and the SWP's imminent demise could have come straight from the pages of the Weekly Worker. I don't know why, but I genuinely expected better of the Observer...

3 Comments:

At 8:51 pm, Blogger Rob said...

Fascism as a term has pretty much been emptied of any accuracy it might once have had. And this isn't just the fault of the pro-war 'left' either, the usage of the term in the 60s,70s and 80s (is it Foucault who talked about fighting the 'fascism in us all') means its entirely useless at describing any particular constellation of social forces, pity really.

 
At 1:59 am, Blogger Snowball said...

Too true, rob.

The most original insult yet is 'Islamo-Trot-Fascist', which I believe was first coined by a Welsh ex Stalinist neo-conservative a few years ago. I'm sure it is only a matter of time before Hitchens/Cohen et al decide to run with it...

 
At 6:09 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

the only thing we need to know about nick cohen and the rest of the pro war "left" is that they are a tiny dismal little group with no movement beyond the hp "decent left" racists, who are not really worthy of our time. its fun to diss them just like the alliance for wankers liberty or the weekly workers, but we have better things to do with our time.
(mind you i like ripping the piss out of nick cohen et al as much as any oneelse!)
also im sure that cohen has used the islamo-trot-fascist term in one of is rants in the liberal press againist the swp. ( i think he is just upset because we would not let him join up) :)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home